The interdisciplinary conference, organized by TraCe in cooperation with by FONAS, examines the impact, control and design of technologies which influence peace and security. Existing approaches towards arms control need to adapt to the changing security landscape, while new civilian and military technologies are changing forms of violence and warfare. Particularly striking areas are cyber warfare and the rapid development of unmanned weapons systems. Issues of nuclear disarmament, missile technology or space weaponry, as well as chemical and biological weapons, are gaining renewed urgency. In addition to the development of new weapons systems, information technology also plays a significant role in the oppression and digital surveillance of civilians during conflicts, and in policing urban space.

Aiming to network under authoritarian actors, civil society is increasingly using social media as a resource to organize cyber protests and to fight for human rights. Apart from acute use in conflict-related contexts, many cases illustrate that technology is increasingly being used by different actors for conflict transformation and to promote peace, aiming to reduce (political) violence in the long term.

Furthermore, the geopolitics of infrastructure, e.g., (renewable) energy and climate change is an urgent topic. Infrastructures are relevant in conflicts, can be manifestations of global injustice, strategic objects in armed conflicts as well as part of a peaceful conflict transformation. Thus, the conference seeks contributions which reflect on the geopolitics of infrastructure and their role.

In general, all of these issues raise the question of the regulation and proliferation of security-relevant technologies as well as their design. These aspects influence who has access to certain technologies, who can benefit or faces risk by their use.

The interdisciplinary conference Science · Peace · Security ’23 aims to facilitate fruitful discussions on current and future challenges in the field of technical peace and conflict research. We seek contributions from the natural and technical sciences, the social and legal sciences, ethics and humanities.

The Science · Peace · Security conference series, maintained by FONAS (Research Network on Science, Disarmament and International Security), was launched in Darmstadt in 2019 and subsequently held in Aachen in 2021. In 2023, it will be hosted in Darmstadt again; followed by Jülich in 2025. In 2023 is co-organized as part of the research project TraCe (BMBF-funded research center „Transformations of Political Violence“), following the tradition of IANUS (natural science and technical peace research) at Technical University of Darmstadt.

Contact: sps23@peasec.de

Groups:

• Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC) (group of Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Reuter) (Coordination)
• Urban Sociology and Sociology of Space (group of Prof. Dr. Sybille Frank)
• Modern History (group of Prof. Dr. Nicolai Hannig)
• International Relations (group of Prof. Dr. Markus Lederer)

Persons:

• Laura Guntrum, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Verena Lasso Mena, International Relations, TU Darmstadt
• Dr. Thea Riebe, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Jona Schwerer, Urban Sociology and Sociology of Space, TU Darmstadt
• Sara-Luise Spittler, Modern History, TU Darmstadt
• Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Reuter, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt

• Dr. Sibylle Bauer, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) 
  
• Dr. Matthias Englert, Oeko-Institut e.V.
• Dr. Friederike Frieß, Institute of Safety and Risk Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
• Prof. Dr. Malte Göttsche, Nuclear Verification and Disarmament, RWTH Aachen University
• Dr. Gunnar Jeremias, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker-Centre for Science and Peace Research (ZNF) at the University of Hamburg
• Dr. Moritz Kütt, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (IFSH)
• Dr. Irmgard Niemeyer, Forschungszentrum Jülich
• Dr. Christoph Pistner, Oeko-Institut e.V.

• PD Dr. Jürgen Altmann, Physics and Disarmament, TU Dortmund
• Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Reuter, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Dr. Thea Riebe, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Thomas Reinhold, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Dr. Niklas Schörnig, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt
• Dr. Jantje Silomon, International Cybersecurity, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy, Hamburg

• Verena Lasso Mena, International Relations, TU Darmstadt
• Prof. Dr. Markus Lederer, International Relations, TU Darmstadt
• Jonas Franken, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Reuter, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt

Technological innovations have geopolitical consequences. This is obvious for military technologies as historical debates about steam ships, air power and missile systems have shown. Also energy systems and their respective infrastructures have been part of the discussion focusing on conflicts about oil and gas as well as the problem of dual use of nuclear energy. More recently, a debate has sprung up about the geopolitics of renewable energies and the Russian invasion of the Ukraine in February 2022 has again proven that the way we design and plan our energy technologies and infrastructures has direct bearing on how conflicts transform and evolve.

• Prof. Dr. Sybille Frank, Urban Sociology and Sociology of Space, TU Darmstadt
• Laura Guntrum, Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), TU Darmstadt
• Prof. Dr. Nicolai Hannig, Modern History, TU Darmstadt
• Jona Schwerer, Urban Sociology and Sociology of Space, TU Darmstadt
• Sara-Luise Spittler, Modern History, TU Darmstadt

Cities are central spaces of violence and its interpretation. They are at the same time scene, target, and site of remembrance of violence. Cities respond to violence by adapting and developing prevention strategies: architecturally and in terms of planning, politically and in terms of social reform, but also in terms of memory and everyday culture. Violent actors orient themselves to the structures of urban spaces by using them for their own purposes or by attacking them specifically. We therefore ask how violence has been expressed in street protests and attacks since industrialization, how forms of action and containment have changed, how protesters, police forces, and onlookers have behaved in violent situations, how rituals of violence have emerged, how they have been interpreted, handed down, transferred across national borders, and transformed, how structural conditions in cities have influenced violence, and how violence in turn shapes urban space.